A.5 Demographic Change Indicators

A tract is considered to have experienced gentrification-related “demographic change” during the observation period (2004-2015) if any two of the following four indicators exceed the values observed in the comparison populations:

SEACCD
    <<<<<<< HEAD
  • The white population share either increased or it decreased less than -5%
  • The share of homeowners either increased more than 3%
  • The share of the population 25 years and older with a bachelor’s degree increased more than 6%
  • The share of household earning more than 80% AMI increased or it decreased less than -5%
    • =======
  • The white population share either increased or it decreased less than -5%
  • The share of homeowners either increased more than 3%
  • The share of the population 25 years and older with a bachelor’s degree increased more than 6%
  • The share of household earning more than 80% AMI increased or it decreased less than -5%
    • >>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225
King County
    <<<<<<< HEAD
  • The white population share either increased or it decreased less than -6%
  • The share of homeowners either increased more than 3%
  • The share of the population 25 years and older with a bachelor’s degree increased more than 5%
  • The share of household earning more than 80% AMI increased or it decreased less than -4%
    • =======
  • The white population share either increased or it decreased less than -6%
  • The share of homeowners either increased more than 3%
  • The share of the population 25 years and older with a bachelor’s degree increased more than 5%
  • The share of household earning more than 80% AMI increased or it decreased less than -4%
    • >>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225
COO Baselines: Seattle Subdivision vs King County
<<<<<<< HEAD

=======

>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225

Race

This map and graph show the change in the share of white people between the two observation periods for each census tract in King County.

The observation periods used in this method are the following five-year spans: 2005-2009 and 2011-2015.


<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225
COO Baselines: Seattle Subdivision vs King County
<<<<<<< HEAD

Data: All Geographies

=======

Data: All Geographies

>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225

Education

This map and graph show the change in the share of adults with a bachelor degree (or a more advanced degree) between the two observation periods for each census tract in Seattle CCD.

The observation periods used in this method are the following five-year spans: 2005-2009 and 2011-2015.


<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225
COO Baselines: Seattle Subdivision vs King County
<<<<<<< HEAD

Data: All Geographies

=======

Data: All Geographies

>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225

Income

This map and graph show the change in the share of moderate/high income households between the two observation periods for each census tract in Seattle CCD.

The observation periods used in this method are the following five-year spans: 2005-2009 and 2011-2015.


<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225
COO Baselines: Seattle Subdivision vs King County
<<<<<<< HEAD

Data: All Geographies

=======

Data: All Geographies

>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225

Housing Tenure

This map and graph show the change in the share of people living in housing units that they own between the two observation periods for each census tract in Seattle CCD.

The observation periods used in this method are the following five-year spans: 2005-2009 and 2011-2015.


<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225
COO Baselines: Seattle Subdivision vs King County
<<<<<<< HEAD

Data: All Geographies


=======

Data: All Geographies


>>>>>>> 67bf09a258bbd02865f1e947a98f11222034b225